Methodology

Every outcome can be explained.

We publish our calculation method because an estimate is only as credible as the assumptions behind it.

Step 01

Collect

Business profile, spend, current providers, currencies and finance workflows. The free analysis uses your answers without a bank connection.

Step 02

Normalize

We map inputs to standard financial categories: card spend, advertising spend, payment volume, currencies and operating time.

Step 03

Model

We apply provider rules, caps, category restrictions, fixed costs and operational assumptions. Current benchmarks use 1% without a cap, €42 per hour and 75% automatable bookkeeping time.

Step 04

Compare

Your current setup is compared with every eligible alternative using the same calculation method.

Step 05

Calculate

Every opportunity receives a conservative, expected and maximum outcome. We never present an uncertain projection as guaranteed savings.

Conservative

€18,420

Expected

€20,940

Maximum

€23,600

Step 06

Prioritize

Opportunities are ranked by economic impact, confidence and implementation effort. The result is an action list, not a score.

Sample calculation

SAMPLE DATA — using the same structure applied to your own figures.

Calculation

Advertentiespend via de zakelijke kaart

Meta-spendIngevoerd€420.000 / jaar
Huidige eligible cashbackProviderdata0,20%
Huidige bruto rewardBerekend€840
Huidige jaarlijkse kaartkostProviderdata€240
Huidige nettowaardeBerekend€600
Alternatieve eligible cashbackProviderdata0,75%
Bruto reward alternatiefBerekend€3.150
Jaarlijkse kost alternatiefProviderdata€420
Verwachte nettowaardeBerekend€2.730
Difference€2.130 / jaar

Bronnen: providertarieven en -voorwaarden (versie 2026.09, laatst gecontroleerd op 15 september 2026) en door de gebruiker opgegeven spend.

Model limitations

Actual outcomes depend on contracts, acceptance, negotiated rates, integrations and changing terms. Results are indicative estimates, not guarantees or financial advice. Always verify current provider terms.

Start free analysis